For startups, securing the right type of funding can make all the difference in the future growth of a company. The choice between revenue-based financing and equity financing is one that many founders have to make that can impact ownership structure and financial flexibility. Each type of financing has distinct characteristics, and may be better suited for certain types of startups over others. In this blog, learn more about revenue vs equity financing, the benefits and limitations of startup financing, and key considerations for making the decision between revenue financing and equity financing.

Revenue-Based vs Equity Financing

What is Revenue-Based Financing?

Revenue-based financing is an alternative funding model where investors provide capital in exchange for a percentage of a company’s future revenues. Unlike traditional loans, repayments fluctuate with monthly revenue, making it a flexible option for businesses with steady income streams.

How Revenue-Based Financing Works

In a revenue-based financing agreement, a startup receives upfront capital in exchange for committing a percentage (typically 2% to 10%) of its monthly gross revenue until a predetermined repayment cap is met. This cap usually ranges between 1.2x to 3x the original investment amount.

For example, if a SaaS company secures $500,000 at a 5% revenue share with a 2.5x repayment cap, it would return 5% of its monthly revenue until it has repaid $1.25 million (2.5x the initial $500K). If the company’s revenue grows, repayments increase; if revenue dips, payments decrease, helping to reduce financial strain for the startup during slower periods.

Key Benefits of Revenue-Based Financing

One of the most attractive aspects of revenue-based financing is that it allows founders to retain full ownership of their company. Unlike equity financing, where investors take a stake in the business, revenue-based financing providers only claim a portion of revenue until the repayment terms are fulfilled. This can make it ideal for founders who want to avoid dilution while still accessing growth capital.

Additionally, revenue-based financing can often be faster to secure than equity funding. Since investors primarily evaluate revenue performance rather than long-term valuation potential, due diligence may be less intensive. This speed makes revenue-based financing an option for startups that need quick capital for inventory, marketing, or hiring.

Limitations of Revenue-Based Financing

However, revenue-based financing is not without its trade-offs. The effective cost of capital can be higher than traditional debt or equity, especially if a company experiences rapid revenue growth. Startups should assess whether the repayment structure aligns with their financial projections before committing to this method of financing.

What is Equity Financing?

Equity financing involves selling ownership stakes in a company to investors—such as angel investors, venture capital firms, or crowdfunding backers—in exchange for capital. Unlike revenue-based financing, equity investors often expect growth through appreciation in company value, typically realized through an exit event like an acquisition or IPO.

How Equity Financing Works

When a startup raises equity financing, it issues shares to investors based on an agreed-upon valuation. Early-stage companies often raise funds through convertible notes, Simple Agreements for Future Equity (SAFEs), or priced equity rounds, with investors receiving preferred or common stock.

For example, if a startup raises $2 million at a $10 million pre-money valuation, the investors receive 16.67% ownership ($2M / $12M post-money). In later funding rounds, early investors may benefit from liquidation preferences, which can help them recoup their investment before other shareholders in an exit scenario.

Key Benefits of Equity Financing

The primary advantage of equity financing is access to capital without immediate repayment obligations. Unlike debt or revenue-based financing, startups don’t make monthly payments, freeing up cash flow for growth initiatives like product development, hiring, and market expansion.

Another major benefit is strategic investor support. Venture capitalists and angel investors often bring industry expertise, mentorship, and valuable connections to partnerships, customers, and future funding rounds. For startups in competitive or capital-intensive industries, this guidance can be just as valuable as the funding itself.

Limitations of Equity Financing

However, equity financing comes with trade-offs, primarily loss of ownership and control. Founders must be comfortable giving up a portion of their company and, in some cases, giving over decision-making power to investors. Additionally, equity rounds can require extensive due diligence, and legal costs, which often take time to close.

Final Thoughts: How to Make the Best Choice

Deciding between revenue-based vs equity financing may be a challenging choice, but understanding the differences, benefits, and limitations can help with the process. Founders should consider capital needs, comfortability of giving up ownership in the company, decision-making implications, and the speed of the transaction before making the decision. And founders are not held to one type of funding – a startup may find that revenue-based financing makes more sense for an earlier funding round and then decide to switch to equity funding for future capital.

Is your startup looking to raise capital? MicroVentures may be able to help you decide which avenue is right for you. Apply today to raise capital with MicroVentures!

APPLY TO RAISE CAPITAL

Want to learn more about growing a startup? Check out the following blogs to learn more:

*****

The information presented here is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, comprehensive offering documentation for any security, investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, an interest, directly or indirectly, in any company. Investing in both early-stage and later-stage companies carries a high degree of risk. A loss of an investor’s entire investment is possible, and no profit may be realized. Investors should be aware that these types of investments are illiquid and should anticipate holding until an exit occurs.

MicroVentures Blog